Part of the problem seems to be the rather simple account of what an emotion is that Brown and Hamlyn use as their starting point: These different forms of love can be mistaken as any of the listed different loves. I have heard this said, but it does seem to me a desperate move to make.
And Solomonp. Love is not just an emotion people feel toward other people, but also a complex tying together of the emotions that two or a few more people have; My personal views and understanding on platonic love is a special form of emotional interdependence.
By focusing on such emotionally complex histories, emotion complex views differ from most alternative accounts of love.
Moreover Badhwar argues, if love is essentially a desire, then it implies that we lack something; yet love does not imply this and, indeed, can be felt most strongly at times when we feel our lives most complete and lacking in nothing.
The implication is that were they to shrug off the language and notions of "love," "being in love," "loving someone," and so on, they would be empowered. Thus, just as I can be emotionally crushed when one of my strong desires is disappointed, so too I can be emotionally crushed when things similarly go badly for my beloved.
Thus, Singer and Brown understand liking to be a matter of desiring, an attitude that at best involves its object having only instrumental and not intrinsic value. As the distinction between eros and agape in Section 1 indicates, there are at least two ways to construe this in terms of whether the lover values the beloved because she is valuable, or whether the beloved comes to be valuable to the lover as a result of her loving him.
The issue here is not merely that we can offer explanations of the selectivity of my love, of why I do not love schmucks; rather, at issue is the discernment of love, of loving and continuing to love for good reasons as well as of ceasing to love for good reasons.
Love is therefore risky—indeed, all the more risky because of the way the identity of the lover is defined in part through the love. Love is not just an emotion people feel toward other people, but also a complex tying together of the emotions that two or a few more people have; it is a special form of emotional interdependence.
If love is to be understood as an emotion complex, we need a much more explicit account of the pattern at issue here: Japanese The Japanese language uses three words to convey the English equivalent of "love".
Helm argues that a projectible pattern of such emotions with a common focus constitute caring about that focus. Scheler, for example, toys with Plato's Ideal love, which is cognitive, claiming: For, as discussed below, some theories of romantic love understand it along the lines of the agape tradition as creating value in the beloved cf.
Eventually, in time, with consequent steps up the ladder, the idea of beauty is eventually no longer connected with a body, but entirely united with Being itself.
Love has therefore been seen as a mechanism to promote parental support of children for this extended time period. The idea of romantic love initially stems from the Platonic tradition that love is a desire for beauty-a value that transcends the particularities of the physical body.
For such critics, who are presenting a metaphysical and epistemological argument, love may be an ejection of emotions that defy rational examination; on the other hand, some languages, such as Papuan, do not even admit the concept, which negates the possibility of a philosophical examination.
Agape arguably draws on elements from both eros and philia in that it seeks a perfect kind of love that is at once a fondness, a transcending of the particular, and a passion without the necessity of reciprocity. Ultimately, there is only one reason for love.
Most modern people would think of Eros as a concept rather than a god. Hamlyn offers a similar account, saying p. There is surely something very right about the idea that love, as an attitude central to deeply personal relationships, should not be understood as a state that can simply come and go.
Nonetheless, it should be clear that what makes an account be an appraisal view of love is not the mere fact that love is understood to involve appraisal; many other accounts do so, and it is typical of robust concern accounts, for example cf.
Different theories approach these questions in different ways, but, as will become clear below, the question of justification is primary.
Emotivists would hold that a statement such as "I am in love" is irreducible to other statements because it is a nonpropositional utterance, hence its veracity is beyond examination.
Such a form of love is impossible for a mortal to achieve. By focusing on such emotionally complex histories, emotion complex views differ from most alternative accounts of love.YES. And indeed, they are the most beautiful relationships ever.
These are the true lifelong relationships; full of love, respect, understanding, admiration and understanding. As a girl, commencing about guy best friends: * They are my ultimate pi.
I hug my friends, both male and female, and i’m married, and i do it right in front of my husband, and i let my lady friends do it to him too! Imagine that! I love hugging, it’s a very personal moment with a friend, where i feel i am giving them a small part of my essence, of my warm-hearted loving soul.
The philosophical investigation of love includes the tasks of distinguishing between the various kinds of personal love, asking if and how love is or can be justified, asking what the value of love is, and what impact love has on the autonomy of both the lover and the beloved. Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more.
Get started now!
Often the best way to get insight into an affair of the heart is to read through what the great minds have said over the years. And Platonic Quotes On Love are no exception - below are a selection which I hope you will like and.
The implication of the Platonic theory of eros is that ideal beauty, which is reflected in the particular images of beauty we find, becomes interchangeable across people and things, ideas, and art: to love is to love the Platonic form of beauty-not a particular individual, but the element they posses of true (Ideal) beauty.
Reciprocity is not.Download